Hi
I would like read your opinion about following configuration
Which configuration (cfg) is correct?
Both cfg works but i read on mikrotik wiki "network cfg can works but it's not always the optimal cfg"
In the first cfg i dont use vlan-filering, it's just a vlan for each physical interface and then i put them inside a bridge
The advantage is i dont put the physical interfaces on a bridge, so a broadcast traffic can't pass through the router and other layer 2 services through vlan1 neither. Only the vlan 90 can pass
The second cfg i put the physical interfaces on a bridge but i used vlan-filtering. Only vlan 90 can pass through the router and i set the "admit only vlan tagged" on the bridge port's
So i would like read your opinions. Thanks
I would like read your opinion about following configuration
Which configuration (cfg) is correct?
Both cfg works but i read on mikrotik wiki "network cfg can works but it's not always the optimal cfg"
In the first cfg i dont use vlan-filering, it's just a vlan for each physical interface and then i put them inside a bridge
The advantage is i dont put the physical interfaces on a bridge, so a broadcast traffic can't pass through the router and other layer 2 services through vlan1 neither. Only the vlan 90 can pass
The second cfg i put the physical interfaces on a bridge but i used vlan-filtering. Only vlan 90 can pass through the router and i set the "admit only vlan tagged" on the bridge port's
So i would like read your opinions. Thanks
Statistics: Posted by DavidTSanchez — Wed Mar 06, 2024 8:55 pm